Blanchard (2008) includes a leader’s directive and supportive
behaviors as the foundation of his situational leadership theory. Directive
behavior typically represents a one-way communication where the leader directs
the activity that the follower will complete. Supportive behaviors are
considered “two-way” where the responses exhibit emotional and social support
and the follower participates with the leader in the discussion. Consider some
of your roles (parent, child, friend, leader, follower, etc.) and provide
examples of how you use supportive and directive behaviors.
Directive and Supportive Behaviors
Consider some of your roles (parent, child, friend, leader, follower, etc.) and provide examples of how you use supportive and directive behaviors?
Directive and supportive behaviors each have their own place in leadership, but the optimal time to use either depends on the situation. Certain levels of authority allow for organizations to maintain structure while also fostering a collaborative environment. For example, during stressful situations in the military which could be a matter of life or death, directive leadership helps guide people through the chaotic atmosphere. This is highly effective because those situations do not permit time for collaboration and more rational decision-making. Instead, decisions need to be made quickly and even intuitively. One could argue that team cohesion would be best served with a leader who always integrates the opinions of others, however, I would argue that directive behaviors are required to make a team function at its peak effectiveness. Personally, this situation comes to mind when I led a group of military members during an Iranian ballistic missile attack against several military bases in the Middle-East. This situation invoked a lot of panic in those of us in harms way, but I did the best I could to maintain a calm composure while providing clear direction. By doing so, I believe my team worried less about what to do next because I communicated one-way and made the decisions for them; therefore, as the leader I exuded directive behaviors which my followers were the recipients of.
Supportive leadership, on the other hand, presents different benefits due to it's two-way nature of communication. According to Jansen et al. (2016), supportive leadership encourages individual initiatives and emphasizes harmonious relationships. This can make team members feel comfortable expressing diverging viewpoints without being criticized which contributes to the exchange of information, knowledge, and ideas. By allowing for the insights and experiences to be shared by each group member, this can make them feel a trust and care in the team, particularly if the leader is already exhibiting these supportive behaviors. In summation, supportive leadership can cultivate team confidence, amplify collaborative working context within cohesive teams, and make problem-solving processes more effective (Jansen et al., 2016). Personally, I see most of my friendships as two-way communication which means supportive behaviors should be the status quo. Two-way communication relaxes members and values the opinions of others. One-way friendships do not sound like a whole lot of fun from my perspective.
While I am not a parent yet, I see parenting as a mix of directive and supportive behaviors. Children are highly impressionable at early ages in which they absorb information like sponges even when one might think they are not watching or listening. Even though children observe behaviors, it does not mean they want to partake in them or know how. Consider potty-training - in the early stages parents generally use a directive approach with firm language to establish goals and boundaries; what is good and what is bad. However, once they
successfully use the bathroom, a supportive energy and tone could be used to
reassure children that they were correct in their actions. I would classify
the leadership style with the most common approach for parenting as "high
directive-high supportive." Our textbook defines this by stating, "in
this approach, the leader focuses communication on both achieving goals and
meeting followers’ socioemotional needs" (Northouse, 2018). I believe that this method reoccurs often in parenting with other examples like learning to talk, walk, cross the street, learning manners, etc. Again, I am no expert and not a parent yet (perhaps in the near future!), but studying these behaviors makes me feel more prepared for the "challenge," if you will. I know I will get some things wrong, but practice makes perfect - and I'm excited!
Chad
References:
Jansen, J. J. P., Kostopoulos, K. C., Mihalache, O. R., & Papalexandris, A. (2016). A socio-psychological perspective on team ambidexterity: The contingency role of supportive leadership behaviours. Journal of Management Studies, 53(6), 939-965. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12183
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (7th ed.). SAGE Publishing.
Comments
Post a Comment